Drilled Shafts...Oscillator/Rotator Shafts...Conventional Shoring...Pre-drilled/Vibrated Piles...Tieback & Tiedown Anchors...Soil Nailing/Vnail Systems...Temporary & Permanent Shotcrete...Sculptured Shotcrete...Secant Pile Walls...Cylinder Pile Walls...Access Shafts...Micropiles...Augercast Piles...Drilled Displacement Piles...Deep Soil Mixing...Cutter Soil Mixing...Jet Mixing...Jet Grouting...Compaction Grouting...Chemical Grouting...Vibro Compaction...Stone Columns...Aggregate Piers...Dynamic Deep Compaction...Dewatering.
DRILLED SHAFTS

Mid City Expo, Culver City, CA

The project consists of:
5 each – 15’ Ø CIDH Pilings
6 each – 11’ Ø CIDH Pilings
12 each – 12’ Ø CIDH Pilings
15 each – 2’ Ø CIDH Pilings

15’ Ø CIDH PILING
Bents 2 through 6

The 15’ Ø Piles have drill depths of up to 112’ deep and were constructed by stabilizing the surrounding soil by means of a Cutter Soil Mix (CSM) operation. The CSM panels were installed in an octagonal pattern with the ends overlapping to form a compression ring. The panels were 9’ – 2” long by 39” wide and extended to depths of 118’ below ground surface.

The CIDH reinforcing steel cages were 14’ 6” Ø by 100’ long and weighing 170,000#. Malcolm Drilling designed and built a Tipping Frame that allowed a single Sumitomo 1500 (150 ton) Crane to lift the cage from horizontal on the ground to complete vertical without damage or racking of the cage. The cage was then released from the Tipping Frame and lifted and placed into final location within the drilled shaft by the Kobelco 250 (250 ton) Crane. Entire operation from initial lift by the Sumitomo to the placement within the shaft lasted 90 minutes.

MDCI used the option to complete the CIDH Piles in two separate concrete pours at Bent 4 only. The first pour was completed from the pile tip elevation up to a construction joint (71’ with 480 c/y of concrete). The construction joint is 29’ below the top of the CIDH cut-off elevation. The second pour was completed following the installation of the column cage from the construction joint elevation to the pile cut-off elevation (29’ with 200 c/y of concrete).

Bents 2, 3, 5 and 6 were completed with one continuous concrete pour. The CIDH portion was poured to below the column elevation (-29 feet below cut-off elevation), the column cage was then placed and secured into the shaft and the concrete placement to cut-off elevation was complete. (Total concrete placed on these days was 680 c/y). The column cage extended 27’ into the CIDH pile and extended 23’ above cut-off elevation. All concrete was placed using MDCI’s 36M boom pump.

The completion of these 15’ Ø shafts presented numerous challenges for MDCI. Among the toughest were the lack of adequate setup room at each drill location site, working adjacent to live traffic, the size and weight of the reinforcing steel cages, subsurface conditions consisting of a high water table elevation, and sand and gravel zones, and the Contract Specifications for Mass Concrete. MDCI eliminated the risk of the caving ground conditions and ultimately eliminated the Mass Concrete restrictions by constructing soil stabilizing panels around the perimeter of the drilled shaft. The Cutter Soil Mix (CSM) panels allowed the shaft to be drilled in the dry to tip elevation and provided a cement liner of the side walls. The Mass Concrete plan provided by MDCI included the use of Thermal Sensors and Cooling Tubes within the concrete attached to the reinforcing steel cage to monitor and control the heat produced in the center of the shaft during hydration of the concrete. The concrete (CSM) panels increased the surface temperature of the shaft walls to 100° F and allowed the placement of a lower cement volume concrete (6.8 sack with 40% fly ash at a slump of 5”). Had the shaft been completed by means of slurry (polymer) displacement, the surface temperature of the shaft walls would have been much lower, between 60° F to 65° F, and the concrete would have had a higher sack content (8.6 sack with 40% fly ash at a slump of 9”). The lower surface temperature and higher cement content would have exceeded the allowable maximum and differential temperature per the specifications resulting in a rejected pile.

 

 
Terms of Use | Privacy Statement © 2010 Malcolm Drilling Co., Inc. All rights reserved